The Centre hosts the following two talks:

1. C. Gluchowski (New College, Oxford), ‘Revising Devotion: Exploring Church Reform through Prayerbook MS. Lat. liturg. f. 4’.

The revision of prayerbooks stands as a significant yet often overlooked aspect of church reform. This article delves into this topic using the Easter prayerbook MS. Lat. liturg. f. 4 from the Bodleian Library in Oxford as a focal point, shedding light on its broader implications. Crafted in the Latin/Low-German tradition, this Easter prayerbook, a fusion of paper and parchment, hails from the Cistercian convent of Medingen near Lüneburg, Germany. This convent, renowned for its scriptorial output, contributed 64 manuscripts to history, spanning from the early 15th to the mid-16th century. Against the backdrop of two pivotal church reforms—the Northern German monastic reform of 1479 and the Lutheran Reformation of 1524/1544—the Medingen convent experienced a profound evolution. Surprisingly, over half of the Medingen manuscripts underwent revisions akin to the Easter prayerbook MS. Lat. liturg. f. 4. This article contends that these revisions serve as a testament to the Medingen nuns’ deliberate cultivation of their convent’s devotional ethos, shaped by the transformative waves of reform. By closely examining the Easter prayerbook MS. Lat. liturg. f. 4, this study seeks to unravel the nuanced role of these nuns as agents of reform—reformatrices—in the late medieval church. Employing the lenses of reframing and recycling, this article illuminates how these women navigated the complexities of religious change, leaving an indelible mark on the ecclesiastical landscape of their time.

2. P. Rea (Scuola Superiore Meridionale, Napoli / Universitat de València), ‘Non ti maravigliare che io non mi distenda nelo scrivere: Female Autographs and Kinship in an Early-Modern Italian Epistolary Corpus’.

In order to ascertain that the scribe is really a woman, palaeographers must often rely on a combination of circumstantial arguments. The aim of this paper will be to discuss some of the possible arguments on the basis of a study of a collection of charters that has just come to light in the Niccolini private archive. These charters, revolving around the Florentine Strozzi family between 1519 and 1572, include numerous letters signed by women: mainly Oretta, wife of Zanobi Strozzi, and her sisters (Caterina, Cassandra, Costanza, and Maddalena), her daughters (Smeralda, suor Alessandra, and suor Dianora), and her sisters-in-law (Lucrezia and Francesca). After identifying the autographs, I will discuss the literacy level of the individual writers, paying particular attention to any hints of a common writing education.

The session will be chaired by H. Lähnemann (SEH, Oxford).

The Centre hosts the following two talks:

1. A. D’Angelo (Rome ‘Sapienza’), ‘Catullan marginalia in the 16th century: the books of Piero Vettori’.

The Bayerische Staatsbibliothek in Munich preserves three printed editions of Catullus’ Liber with marginal notes by Piero Vettori (1499-1585). This important scholar edited dozens of Classical authors, but never published anything on Catullus: thus, these books are the main extant evidence of his work on this poet. The notes contain variant readings, original conjectures and loci similes, and they offer new insights on Vettori’s philological method and his library. Through these marginalia, I will try to point out Vettori’s main interests in Catullus’ poetry and the sources he used for his Catullan studies.

2. M. Schilling (Oxford), ‘A special form of devotion – personifications of time in late medieval prayer books from Northern Germany’.

Addressing liturgical holidays, for example welcoming Mr Easterday, is a particular characteristic of late medieval vernacular prayer-books from North German female convents. They highlight a distinct form of poetics, because describing and interacting with specific points in time – personifying them – allows an intercommunication with the divine that conveys a certain form of agency to the speaker. In this paper, we explore the particular type of prayer-books these personifications are found in, talk about their material indicators within the text, and think about the special role of the prayer-books from the Cistercian convent Medingen within this distinct manuscript landscape.

The talks will take place in the Memorial Room of The Queen’s College on the 13th of February (5.15-6.45pm).

The Centre hosts the following lecture: Patrick Finglass (Bristol), ‘Edgar Lobel and the text of Sappho’.

The Centre hosts the following two talks:

1. A. Ellis (Bern), ‘“Greek” in the Medieval Latin Manuscripts of Josephus: Reconstructing the Philological Workings of a Late-Antique Translator’

This talk begins with a series of “Greek” annotations in the margins of a manuscript in Bern (Bern Burgerbibliothek 183), produced in Fleury in the late 10th century by a lay scribe called Rotbertus. The manuscript contains the late-antique Latin translation of Josephus’ Jewish War and its handful of Greek marginalia annotate Josephus’ description of the Essenes, an ascetic community who inhabited the Judean deserts in the first-century BCE. In this talk, I reconstruct the original Greek behind these marginalia and ask how these snippets of garbled Graeca made their way into a medieval Latin manuscript. I trace them back through the manuscript tradition and, after weighing up several possibilities, suggest that we are dealing with Greek words left in the Latin translation by its anonymous author, reflecting unsolved philological quandaries.

2. S. De Martin (Oxford), ‘Reassessing the transmission of Strato com. fr. 1 K.-A.’

In this paper I will discuss the textual transmission of the only extant fragment ascribed to the comic poet Strato. In these hilarious forty-seven lines, a man reports a dialogue he had with a cook who speaks using Homeric glosses – a conversation which resolves in a series of misunderstandings. The fragment is preserved in book 9 of Athenaeus’ Deipnosophists, as well as in P.Cair. 65445, a ‘schoolbook’ that includes a literary anthology. Besides some lacunae due to material damage, the papyrus’ version lacks five lines that are extant in Athenaeus, though the text does not present major linguistic or semantic difficulties. Does Athenaeus preserve an interpolated version of the text? Or is the papyrus’ text abridged? Things are complicated by the fact that in book 14 Athenaeus cites again the first four lines of the text and ascribe them to Philemon.

The talks will take place in the Memorial Room of The Queen’s College on the 7th of November (3.30-5pm).

The Centre hosts the following lecture: Mary Carruthers (NYU and Oxford), ‘Understanding Solid Figures in Early Medieval Manuscripts: how Rhetoric and Geometry interact’.

If you are planning to attend online, please register at this link: https://forms.gle/SCHWcQbHQgCL6XWi7

The Centre hosts the following two talks:

1. Marius Del Core (Pisa/Oxford), ‘Omitti possunt. Evidence for abridgement and athetesis in Plautine manuscripts’

2. Stefano Milonia (SSM Naples), ‘Super and Contra. Conversion and resemantisation of mediaeval French lyric in the Ludus super Anticlaudianum’

Please register at this link (whether you are planning to attend in person or online): https://forms.gle/7h5zno5cABGe1Q6o6

The Centre hosts the following lecture: Prof. Jean-Luc Fournet (Collège de France): ‘The End of a Script and the Beginning of a Myth: Hieroglyphs and the Greeks’.

The lecture will be chaired by Amin Benaissa (Christ Church).

Please register at this link (whether you are planning to attend in person or online): https://forms.gle/dLarnLdUU5HZ1fgH9

Abstract: The Egyptian language coexisted with Greek from the time of the conquest of Egypt by Alexander the Great (332 BC). This cohabitation had a decisive impact on the use of Egyptian scripts (hieroglyphs and their cursive versions, hieratic and demotic) and led to their disappearance and replacement by Coptic, whose writing is almost purely Greek. At the same time as these scripts were declining, the Greeks developed conceptions about them which influenced the vision that modern Europe came to have of hieroglyphs until Champollion refuted it decisively. This lecture will outline the development of this myth.

In celebration of the release of vol. 2 of the Journal of Manuscript and Text Cultures (MTC), which takes an explicitly experimental approach of involving digital tools for the presentation of research in manuscript cultures, the Centre for Manuscript and Text Cultures (CMTC) is holding a round table on Wednesday the 26th of April (week 1 of Trinity Term), 5.15pm UK time, at the Memorial Room of The Queen’s College, Oxford. The topic of the round table will be digital publishing and future research in manuscript studies.

The round table will be chaired and moderated by Richard Ovenden, OBE, Professorial Fellow and Bodley’s Librarian. Members of the round table are Yegor Grebnev, Lesley Smith, Máire Ní Mhaonaigh, and Simon Aldridge.

Máire Ní Mhaonaigh is professor of Celtic and medieval studies at the University of Cambridge and Fellow at St John’s College. Her research stands at the interface of history and literature and focuses on connections between Ireland, England and Scandinavia and the wider western world. Máire is currently working on a complex multi-manuscript corpus of medieval Irish landscape literature, as part of a Leverhulme project which she leads, and she co-directs ongoing research on the electronic dictionary of medieval Irish (www.dil.ie) funded by the AHRC.

Lesley Smith is professor of medieval intellectual history at Oxford and Fellow of Harris Manchester College. Her research centres on the medieval Bible as both an intellectual and a material object, as it was studied in the schools and proto-university of medieval Paris. Lesley is the co-editor of vol. 2 of MTC and a member of the board of CMTC.

Yegor Grebnev is Distinguished Associate Research Fellow at Beijing Normal University (Zhuhai) and an assistant professor at BNU-HKBU United International College. Trained as a specialist on early China, he has initiated multiple collaborative projects with scholars of history, texts, and manuscripts from various regions of pre-modern world. Yegor is the co-editor of vol. 2 of MTC and a member of the board of CMTC.

Simon Aldridge is professor of Main Group Chemistry at Oxford and Fellow of The Queen’s College. He is the Director of the OxICMF CDT and will bring the perspective of the exact sciences to the table.

If you are planning to attend online, please register at this link: https://forms.gle/aMSksCmTsV8Msq9C7. Zoom links will be sent by email by 10,00am (UK time) on the day of the talk.

All welcome

The Centre hosts the following lecture: Yannis Assael (Google DeepMind), ‘Predicting the past with deep neural networks’.

The lecture will be chaired by Dirk Meyer (Queen’s).

Please register at this link (whether you are planning to attend in person or online): https://forms.gle/qrdgtwBXKnLy1Leg7

Abstract: Ancient history relies on disciplines such as epigraphy for evidence of the thought, language, society and history of past civilizations. However, over the centuries, many inscriptions have been damaged to the point of illegibility, transported far from their original location and their date of writing is steeped in uncertainty. To address these challenges we present Ithaca, a deep neural network for the textual restoration, geographical attribution and chronological attribution of ancient Greek inscriptions. The goal of this presentation is to demonstrate how recent advances in the field of Deep Learning can assist and expand a historian’s workflow, and highlight the importance of joint interdisciplinary research.

The Centre hosts the following two talks:

1. Giulia Colli (Pisa), ‘How to Rewrite Greek Tragedy: Oedipus’ parting words in the end of Euripides’ Phoenician Women’

2. Enrico Prodi (UCL), ‘Commentary by excerpts: Didymus’

The talks will be chaired by Chiara Meccariello (Exeter).

Please register at this link (whether you are planning to attend in person or online): https://forms.gle/dARYUHzX1a9iA2EU9

Abstracts:

1. Tragic endings are a very problematic issue, as our understanding of how ancient authors conceived the end of their plays rests on uncertain data and is likely to be influenced by our modern literary taste. In addition, final lines are often liable to textual corruption and omission. These objective limitations, together with the increasing awareness that the tragic texts have been widely interpolated by readers and actors, has led critics to question the authenticity of the extant endings. This critical trend has led radical intervention (e.g. Ritter expunged all of Sophocles’ endings), but tragic endings have been shown, beyond reasonable doubt, to be a favourite target of interpolators.
The finale of Euripides’ Phoenician Women has surely been tampered with additions and rewriting by ancient actors who wanted to create an intertextual as well as intervisual connection with the other famous plays by Sophocles on the Theban saga. Oedipus’ parting lines (1758-63) in particular are very similar to the last lines delivered by the chorus at the end of Oedipus the King (1523-30), which have also been suspected of interpolation. An investigation of the language, content, and dramaturgy of these closing lines will allow us to shed light on the agenda and poetics of interpolators, as well as on the relative chronology of these two texts. I will argue that Oedipus’ parting lines are likely to be the result of adaptation of Sophocles’ model to a new context, since they fit less into the dramatic action and show a systematic use of patchwork technique with less meaningful variation.

2. Didymus ‘Khalkenteros’ was one of the most prominent commentators of Greek texts in the late first century b.C. and early first a.D. Material from his commentaries survives in the scholia to many works of poetry, but a papyrus published in 1904 gives us a large chunk of a complete work: a commentary of Demosthenes. Almost half of the text consists of quotations, mostly from historical sources. The paper investigates Didymus’ use of, and explicit reflection on, excerpts.

The Centre hosts the following lecture: Mykola Tarasenko (Kyiv/Trinity College, Oxford): ‘What Can the “Greenfield Papyrus” (pLondon BM EA 10554) Tell Us about Its Owner?’

Please register at this link (whether you are planning to attend in person or online): https://forms.gle/nEye2odPFrqV3DKGA

Abstract: In this lecture I shall discuss the papyrus of the Egyptian priestess Nesi-ta-nebet-asheru (pGreenfield), pLondon BM 10554 (21–22^nd Dynasties).  The unique composition of the text and the illustrations in this roll, along with its impressive length (40.53 m), will be contextualised by different factors, such as the social rank/status of the owner, their inclination for “innovative” actions in funerary ritual that was marked on the burial goods, and the anxiety about their real and posthumous position at the end of the Dynasty and possible family fraction.

The Centre hosts the following two talks:

Benedetta Bessi (Venice/Stanford): ‘Towards a Digital Edition of the Liber insularum by Cristoforo Buondelmonti’

Joseph Mason (New College, Oxford): ‘Oral and Written Transmission in Old French Song: a reassessment’

Details will be provided soon!

The event will be hosted on Zoom: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87842150494?pwd=ZXdibzA1d3R1RG1hN3BqcWdGOXJSdz09

1. Amin Benaissa (Classics, Lady Margaret Hall): Ancient Slavery from the Perspective of the Papyri. New documents from Oxyrhynchus

After a brief introduction to the Oxyrhynchus papyri for non-specialists, this talk will discuss some documents relating to slavery recently published in vol. 86 of The Oxyrhynchus Papyri. These new texts illustrate some typical life-patterns of the enslaved: slavery from infancy, repeated sales, in some cases displacement across the Mediterranean, employment in weaving and wet-nursing, and, for the fortunate, manumission. Of particular note are two sale contracts concluded outside Egypt (one of them in Lycia in modern-day Turkey), which would have reached Oxyrhynchus along with the slaves concerned. In other sales, we encounter slaves brought from Crete, Mauretania, and Phrygia – stark examples of the deracination of slaves in the Roman world and Egypt’s integration in the Mediterranean-wide slave trade. There are also more unusual texts, such as a letter about a missing slave and a record of proceedings of an auction.

2. Katherine Olley (English, St Hilda’s College): Liminal Landscapes: Childbirth and the Uncanny in Old Norse Literature

Childbirth scenes in Old Norse literature frequently involve negotiating a liminal space, whether it be the dreamscapes of Sverris saga and Ectors saga, straddling the worlds of waking and sleeping, or the burial mounds present in Óláfs þáttr Geirstaðaálfs and Gǫngu-Hrólfs saga, which intertwine the worlds of the living and the dead. The paper explores these liminal landscapes in more depth, taking as its central focus Óláfs þáttr Geirstaðaálfs, in which a man called Hrani is visited by Óláfr Geirstaðaálfr in a dream. Óláfr Geirstaðaálfr instructs Hrani to break into Óláfr’s burial mound and take his ring, his knife and belt, and his sword. Before leaving the mound, Hrani is to cut off Óláfr’s head with the sword. He is then to take the belt to Ásta Guðbrandsdóttir, who is labouring with a difficult childbirth. When he wraps the belt around her, she will be delivered and he is to claim the honour of naming her son as a reward. Everything happens as Óláfr Geirstaðaálfr predicts and the boy, the future Saint Óláfr, is named by Hrani after Óláfr Geirstaðaálfr. By close analysis of Óláfs þáttr Geirstaðaálfs, the paper argues that Old Norse childbirth narratives are not just liminal but specifically ‘uncanny’, loosely defined as the disquieting or eerie sensation evoked by the alienation of something once familiar⁠. Recognising the uncanniness of childbirth in Old Norse literature allows us to advance beyond simplistic ‘rites of passage’ analyses to a more nuanced understanding of childbirth and its role in Old Norse literature and life.